[LCA2011-Chat] Some Anti-Harassment Policies considered harmful

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: <follower>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 02:08:38 +1000

On 1 February 2011 01:26, Luke Weston <reindeerflotilla at gmail.com> wrote:
> But did we see such a less-imbalanced turnout of haecksen this year because
> of the implementation of this geek feminism policy? I can't imagine that it
> was really a significant factor.
Received on Tue Feb 01 2011 - 02:08:38 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: follower: "Re: [LCA2011-Chat] Some Anti-Harassment Policies considered harmful"
Previous message: Susanne Ruthven: "[LCA2011-Chat] Some Anti-Harassment Policies considered harmful"
In reply to: Luke Weston: "[LCA2011-Chat] Some Anti-Harassment Policies considered harmful"
Next in thread: Andrew Ruthven: "[LCA2011-Chat] Some Anti-Harassment Policies considered harmful"
Reply: Andrew Ruthven: "[LCA2011-Chat] Some Anti-Harassment Policies considered harmful"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 19:34:12 GMT