On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 02:08 +1000, follower wrote:
> On 1 February 2011 01:26, Luke Weston <reindeerflotilla at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But did we see such a less-imbalanced turnout of haecksen this year because
> > of the implementation of this geek feminism policy? I can't imagine that it
> > was really a significant factor.
> From another thread, Noirin wrote:
>
> "One of the absolute hard limits for me in deciding to keep these
> commitments was that I was only going to attend a conference if it had
> an anti-harassment policy, and people I trusted to apply that policy
> if necessary."
>
> -- <http://lists.followtheflow.org/pipermail/chat/2011-January/001514.html>
<cough> It did have strong, in fact much stronger
anti-harrasment/discrimination guidelines in the T&Cs already. The
"policy" made no mention at all about involving the Police or other
appropriate agencies if required. The T&C's *do*.
Also, all people attending the conference, speakers and delegates have
to agree to the T&Cs.
--
Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand
At home: andrew at etc.gen.nz |
|
|
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.followtheflow.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20110201/9ee76f3c/attachment.pgp>
Received on Tue Feb 01 2011 - 08:54:27 GMT